
CHARLOTTE, N.C.—As the CRE market picks up steam, competitive pressures are creating a tendency to push deals through. With an eye on closing deals, many lenders don’t go beyond the basics of the due diligence process. That means Recognized Environmental Conditions (REC) can sometimes get filed away as “resolved” with little further investigation. There are several ways this happens: Certain institutions’ risk profiles make them comfortable with the risk of smaller RECs, and digging deeper to an identified REC by conducting a soil and groundwater investigation is an upfront cost that increases the deals expenses and may delay closing.
But, as Kristine MacWilliams, PE of Partner Engineering North Carolina, PLLC sees it, without a realistic picture of a seemingly limited REC, the buyer or lender could be leaving themselves exposed to hidden risk. And, in many cases, it can also protect against substantial long-term costs and complex environmental liabilities. GlobeSt.com spoke to the technical director or Partner’s Subsurface Investigation Group to find out what levels of investigation are appropriate for a given situation, and how to best balance cost, risk, and competitive pressures.
Continue reading the GlobeSt blog here.

July 02, 2026
Adrienne Perez, an Environmental Due Diligence Consultant, joins as Technical Director for Agency Services in Partner Engineering and Science's environmental service line.

March 24, 2026
As PFAS continue to reshape the construction risk landscape, lenders that proactively integrate PFAS considerations into underwriting, due diligence, and loan structuring are better positioned to manage uncertainty and protect collateral value.

March 11, 2026
In this Globe St. article, Brett Hayes discusses how sellers who complete due diligence before going to market can reduce re-trades and keep deals moving forward.





