For most commercial real estate transactions, environmental due diligence, in the form of a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA), helps to determine whether the site of interest may have contamination concerns, due to past or current activities, that could present liability concerns for the property stakeholders. Under ideal circumstances, your environmental consultant will provide a report without any potential concerns. But what happens when the Phase I ESA report finds a potential problem or a “Recognized Environmental Condition”? For many clients, finding a REC is the most dreaded conclusion, because it can pose a roadblock to their deal or require spending more money than they had allocated to assess and/or mitigate the situation.
There is a common assumption that if a Phase 1 ESA finds a REC, the next step automatically has to mean conducting a Phase II ESA subsurface investigation. Sometimes that is the case, but not always. There are several options beyond the Phase 1 ESA or in lieu of a Phase II that can help mitigate environmental risk.
To read the full blog on GlobeSt.com, please click here.

April 27, 2026
In this article from Propmodo.com, Jerry Ostrander discusses a number of important factors to consider to help prevent environmental contamination concerns from becoming impenetrable roadblocks to development projects. Environmental challenges are a reality in many development projects.

March 24, 2026
As PFAS continue to reshape the construction risk landscape, lenders that proactively integrate PFAS considerations into underwriting, due diligence, and loan structuring are better positioned to manage uncertainty and protect collateral value.

March 24, 2026
As of March 1, 2026, Connecticut officially transitioned to its new Release-Based Cleanup Regulations (RBCRs) , replacing the long-criticized Property Transfer Act for newly triggered environmental obligations.




